THE NATURE OF PRO-LIFE ISSUES
1. Direct threats to human life include first of
all abortion, which takes the lives of well over
a million US children annually; embryonic stem
cell harvesting; euthanasia; and cloning.
Additional threats to human life include
poverty, capital punishment, racism, war,
nuclear arms proliferation and exploitation.
Since each and every human being is unique and
important, one's personhood or worth should not
be arbitrarily determined by another's choice.
No one exists solely as a means to someone
else's happiness. The choices we make, as
individuals and as a society, must be weighed in
light of their impact on human life and dignity.
Do you acknowledge both the breadth of pro life
issues, and the primacy of some of those issues,
namely abortion, embryonic stem cell harvesting,
euthanasia, and cloning?
YES
ABORTION
2.
Do you believe that a unique human life begins
at conception?
YES
If not, when? ___ 3 mths
___ 6 mths ___ 9 mths
___ 1 yr ___ 18 yrs?
|
|
3.
The 14th Amendment
states "nor shall any state deprive any person
of life, liberty or property without due process
of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
The Supreme Court in
Roe v. Wade, 1973,
stated that "if this suggestion of personhood is
established, the appellant's case, of course,
collapses, for the fetus' right to life would
then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th]
Amendment." The Court regrettably concluded
though that "we need not resolve the difficult
question of when life begins. When those trained
in the respective disciplines of medicine,
philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at
any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in
the development of man's knowledge, is not in a
position to speculate as to the answer."
Do you believe that the State has a
compelling interest in protecting human life
beginning at conception?
Yes
4.
Is taking the life of a pre-born child through
abortion ever morally permissible? Check
all that apply:
_____ No, it's never permissible
__X___ Yes, to save
mother's life- In this life or death
situation it should
be the mother’s decision whether to
choose her own life or the life of the
child.
_____ Yes, in cases of rape or incest
____ Yes, for physical deformity
|
_____ Yes, for
gender
_____ Yes, for
race
_____ Yes, to punish spouse
_____ Yes, it's always permissible
|
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS AND CLONING
5.
Do you oppose embryonic stem cell research or
human cloning, whether publically or privately
funded?
Yes
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN ABORTION
6.
Peer reviewed studies have shown that parental
involvement laws reduce the occurrence of risky
sex in teens, and more than 30 states currently
have some form of them. Either the teen
refrains from engaging in sex or is more careful
before having sex. These laws help teen
mothers and fathers get the support and guidance
they need from parents in this important
decision. Not having them risks parental
estrangement or alienation from the child when
in the greatest need and denies the dignity of
the family. Minors already must have
parental approval for even the most minor types
of medical procedures or medications and
should also for the complex procedure of
abortion. Without parental
involvement, a minor impregnated by an adult
often times is pressured into having an abortion
so as to conceal the fact that the adult is
guilty of statutory rape.
Will you promote/support parental involvement
laws (with judicial override) for minors when
seeking an abortion?
Yes
MEDICAL CONSCIENCE CLAUSES
7.
"The trend toward accepting the termination of
some human lives as a normal part of medicine is
accelerating ... Courts, policymakers, media
leaders - even the elites of organized medicine
- increasingly assert that patient rights and
respect for patients’ choices should trump the
consciences of medical professionals.
Indeed, the time may soon arrive when doctors,
nurses, and pharmacists will be compelled to
take, or be complicit in the taking of, human
life, regardless of their strong religious or
moral objections thereto." (Westlie
J. Smith, 2009).
Should doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other
medical professionals be granted the right to
refuse participation in the provision of medical
services that violate the person's moral,
ethical or religious beliefs?
Yes
PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE
8.
Washington State Initiative 1000
which was passed in 2008, legalized Physician
Assisted Suicide (PAS) by allowing doctors to
prescribe lethal doses of barbiturates to
certain patients. An objection to this
sanctioning of suicide is that some vulnerable
persons, such as those who are feeble,
depressed, mentally ill, or handicapped, will
likely experience coercion to end their lives.
For them a right to die, already protected in
the Natural Death Act, (RCW
70.122),
may become a duty to die. The American
Medical Association (policy
H-140.952)
as well as the Washington State Medical
Association (2007
Resolution A-7)
oppose PAS. The AMA stated that "physician
assisted suicide is fundamentally inconsistent
with the physician's professional role."
The initiative uses vague language that enable
doctors "acting in good faith" to assist
mentally ill or depressed patients to commit
suicide, while protecting doctors from civil and
criminal lawsuits. Health care insurers
can cut costs by providing prescriptions for
suicide. Will society's sanction of
suicide have unintended consequences?
Sponsor and former governor Booth Gardner says
that this is only a “first step” in legalizing
assisted suicide for anyone who wants it.
When society fails to protect vulnerable people
in their troubles, but instead offers them the
violence of suicide, has not society abandoned
them? Do
you oppose physician assisted suicide?
MARRIAGE PRESERVATION
9.
Children develop best within the context of a
biologically related family. This is a
scientifically proven fact which the
Washington State Supreme Court
referenced when in 2006, it ruled on the state's
1998 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The
court determined that the state's limitation of
marriage to heterosexual couples "is
constitutional because the legislature was
entitled to believe that limiting marriage to
opposite-sex couples furthers ... the well-being
of children by encouraging families where
children are reared in homes headed by the
children’s biological parents." In
concurrence,
Justice James Johnson
wrote "The unique and binary biological nature
of marriage and its exclusive link with
procreation and responsible child rearing has
defined the institution [of marriage in law]."
In order to affirm and protect children’s rights
and the primacy of those rights over adults’
aspirations for novel family forms, do you
oppose laws that change the definition of
marriage to include homosexual and polygamous
relationships?
I personally believe in the traditional
definition of marriage however, the voters have
spoken on this issue.
My focus is on the protection of the
children of all families regardless of their
makeup.
PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION
10.
The Washington State Legislature in 2007 passed
ESSB 5297
requiring school districts to teach
"scientifically accurate" (aka comprehensive)
sex education, if they teach sex ed at all. The
typical comprehensive sex education program
spends as little as 5% of the time teaching
abstinence principles (Zogby
3/27/07),
instead spending significantly more time
teaching students how to put condoms on models
of male genitalia and promoting alternative
forms of sexual activity called outercourse,
which may include showering together and mutual
masturbation as effective ways to avoid
pregnancy and disease. In contrast, an emphasis
on abstinence means teaching students about
building healthy relationships and bolstering
self worth and self-control.
Given that ESSB 5297 allows school districts a
wide range in how the law is applied, will you
work to maximize sex education that is
wholesome, not dehumanizing and truly safe?
Yes
DEATH
PENALTY
11.
The death penalty in the United States should:
_____ not be used
|
_____
be used about the same
|
_____
be used less
|
_____
be used more
|
GAMING
12.
A proposed casino off I-5 near Ridgefield is
projected to be one of the largest in the
nation. What is your position on the
building of this casino? The latest news
can be found
here on the Citizens Against Reservation
Shopping blog.
Unless there are significant
changes to the proposed casino, I oppose it.
QUALIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS
13.
Please state your qualifications for office such
as professional, educational, family and
community accomplishments. You may also
add any any further comments regarding the
relationship of your candidacy to respect life
issues.
I am a mother, grandmother and small business
owner.
I have been extensively involved locally
for over 5 years.
I am on the Leadership Council for
National Federation of Independent Business, the
Govt Affairs Committee of Assoc of WA Business
(AWB), a member of SW WA Search and Rescue and
involved in many other
community efforts.
I will work to represent the people of
the 17th district and of WA state
with the utmost of integrity.
I will strive to minimize the
over-regulation of Washington citizens and look
to preserve individual rights in all cases. My
website is
ElectLyndaWilson.com
WEBSITE POSTING PERMISSION.
May
Life Pac post your survey response on its
website?
|
|